I'm not familiar with Honeycomb and assumed that 3.0 vs 3.1 was more akin to 2.2 vs 2.3 than it was to 2.3.3 vs 2.3.4. If the opposite is the case then the merge and rename to 3.x-honeycomb makes sense to me!

The 2.0-eclair -> 2.1-eclair mapping is a sure thing, I went ahead and did that bit now. I have no problem renaming it to 2.x-eclair except that almost no one uses 2.0, so I think there will be less confusion if left as 2.1-eclair.

(Follow a consistent numbering scheme, Google!)

I'm not familiar with Honeycomb and assumed that 3.0 vs 3.1 was more akin to 2.2 vs 2.3 than it was to 2.3.3 vs 2.3.4. If the opposite is the case then the merge and rename to 3.x-honeycomb makes sense to me!

The 2.0-eclair -> 2.1-eclair mapping is a sure thing, I went ahead and did that bit now. Almost no one uses 2.0, and 2.x implies 2.2 and 2.3 are included, so I think there will be less confusion if left as 2.1-eclair.

(Follow a consistent numbering scheme, Google!)